Diagnosis · Monitoring · Audit
Three ways to engage, depending on whether you need a point-in-time look, recurring oversight, or a formal review. Details and scope are agreed with you — start with a conversation if you are not sure where to begin.
Diagnosis
A structured look at hiring outcomes to highlight where disparities may appear across groups and stages — useful when you want an objective read before you invest in deeper changes.
Monitoring
Ongoing visibility into fairness-related signals as hiring continues — so changes in volume, process, or tooling do not outrun what your team can see.
Audit
An independent review with documented methods and human oversight on formal engagements — for teams that need a serious paper trail, not a self-attestation.
Why teams reach out
Automated hiring is now common, and expectations around documentation, fairness review, and vendor independence are catching up. We are working with early customers in regulated and high-volume hiring — if you need named references as part of procurement, ask when you contact us.
When the rules move
NYC Local Law 144 and similar regimes are spreading. When your CHRO is pulled into disclosure or vendor diligence, a written, independent read on fairness signals is easier to defend than the scoring vendor's slides alone.
When legal asks for receipts
Your general counsel wants to know what was checked before the new ATS rolls out everywhere. "The vendor said it was fine" rarely satisfies that question — a scoped review gives you something you can point to.
When the numbers do not wait
Hiring surges, last-minute reqs, and messy exports are normal. We scope methods to the data and timelines you have so oversight does not depend on a perfect warehouse first.
Pricing
Published list prices for each product line. Final scope, taxes, and terms are confirmed in writing before you commit — use contact if your situation needs something custom.
Diagnosis
Fairness scan · one-time
Free scan
$0
No account required
- Top-level risk view
- Disparity flag
- First hiring stage
- On-screen results
Full report
$299
Per analysis
- All hiring stages
- Written report (PDF)
- Regulatory mapping
- Remediation suggestions
Report pack
$799
Bundle · one-time
- 3× full reports
- Use within 12 months
- Same org or different scopes
- Good for quarterly snapshots
Monitoring
Per month · billed annually
Starter
$199
Per month · billed annually
- Monthly fairness analysis
- Core dashboard
- Email alerts
- Up to ~500 hires/mo
Standard
$399
Per month · billed annually
- Everything in Starter
- Monthly PDF digest
- ATS integration
- Up to ~2,000 hires/mo
Growth
$799
Per month · billed annually
- Everything in Standard
- Intersectional analysis
- Multiple ATS connections
- Unlimited hire volume
Audit
Formal engagement
Focused
$2,500
Single system · one jurisdiction
- Statistical fairness review
- Human review & signoff
- Assurance report (PDF)
- Mapped to agreed scope
Full audit
$5,000
Full pipeline in scope
- Statistical & governance review
- Multi-jurisdiction mapping
- Regulatory gap analysis
- Evidence appendix
Annual program
$8,000
Per year · 2 full audits
- Two full audits per year
- Consistent methodology
- Year-on-year comparison
- For recurring assurance needs
Sound methods,
practical outputs.
Our work is grounded in established statistical practice for comparing selection and outcomes across groups, adapted to the hiring stages and fields you include in scope.
We take data handling seriously: we only retain what a given engagement requires, we are transparent about limitations, and we flag when sample sizes or data quality mean results should be read cautiously.
About OtarskiIndependence
- We are structured to review hiring AI without also selling you the underlying scoring or ATS product.
- Formal engagements include human review so outputs are not only machine-generated.
Next step
Tell us what you are trying to learn or demonstrate. We will respond with a sensible path — or a candid note if we are not the right fit.
We work alongside your legal team, not instead of them. Otarski does not provide legal advice; your counsel interprets regulatory obligations in your context.